Area - City Maps
Due Diligence Guidelines Contents
Appropriate Maps
-
Example C
- Text large and clear
- Only major identifying streets are names
- Blown-up detail map of location effective
- Good presentation of location relative to city perimeter
- Subject of map clearly identified
- Directional arrows clearly visible
- Shows proximity of subject property to pertinent campus
- Limited extraneous information
- Could be further improved by:
- Show only North directional arrow
- Text identifying subject could be larger
- Clearly identify city name
-
Example D
- Text large and clear
- Only major identifying streets are names
- Good presentation of location relative to city
- Subject of map clearly identified
- Directional arrows clearly visible
- Limited detail
- Could be further improved by:
- Show only North directional arrow
- Show proximity of subject property to pertinent campus
- Show less extraneous information, fewer secondary streets
Deficient Maps
-
Example 3
- Survey does not include proper information for locational map
- Cannot tell where property is
- Extraneous information included
- Text too small
- Confusing
-
Example 4
- Plat does not include proper information for locational map
- Cannot tell where property is
- Extraneous information included
- Text too small
- Confusing
- Too much detail
- No directional arrow
